Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Hayes v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05635
Plaintiff:
Trudy Hayes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05886
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05817
Plaintiff:
LaRita D Hayes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hayes v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04943
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tanakia Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kristen Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Merriman v. Mays et al
as 1:2020cv00938
Defendant:
Warden Mays, Aramark, R. Azmoun and others
Plaintiff:
Monolito J. Merriman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
