Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01117
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Chavez v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Max Chavez
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Steve Sanders and John Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Frowner et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Petitioner:
Howard Dean Bailey
Respondent:
Ray Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Republican Party of New Mexico et al v. King et al
as 1:2011cv00900
Plaintiff:
Republican Party of New Mexico , Republican Party of Bernalillo County , Republican Party of Dona Ana County and others
Defendant:
Gary King , Dianna J. Duran, Kari Brandenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Lunsford v. Howard et al
as 2:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cody Lunsford
Defendant:
Jon M Howard and Clovis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford v. Howard et al
as 1:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cody Lunsford
Defendant:
Jon M Howard and Clovis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Los Vigiles Land Grant et al v. Rebar Haygood Ranch, LLC et al
as 6:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Los Vigiles Land Grant and Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Rebar Haygood Ranch, LLC , Rocky Knob Ranch, LLC , James Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fones v. Veterans Administration Medical Center et al
as 1:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Howard Fones
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Medical Center and George Marnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. BHP Navajo Coal Co., et al.
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Dommicita Allen, Brian Allison, Duane Allison and others
Defendant:
BHP Navajo Coal Company and San Juan Coal Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
