Cases 41 - 50 of 330
Spivey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv05234
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi, Warden Pontiac C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hansen v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hansen
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Corporation, Bayer AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wamiq v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv02716
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Wamiq
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Thomas v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Thomas
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Sheronda Phillips, Mellissa Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gully v. Nurse et al
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully, Jr
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, N Randi, Sheryl Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
