Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Dennison v. Marion County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dennison
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Office, Hardin County Detention Center, Easton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Isaias Santiago Vazquez
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catoe v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
John Robert Catoe
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners, Christy Abrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison v. Marion County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dennison
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Office, Hardin County Detention Center, Easton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennison v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00377
Petitioner:
Jimmie Lee Dennison
Respondent:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muth v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2013cv00225
Plaintiff:
Justin Muth
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geary v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah A. Geary
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Routt et al
as 3:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Montgomery
Defendant:
Ricky Routt, Danny Allen, Hardin County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangum v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
George Mangum
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2010cv00596
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
George H. Aubrey, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
