Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Hart v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2013cv00160
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Hart
Respondent:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hart v. Commonwealth of Tazewell County, Virginia
as 7:2012cv00277
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Tazewell County, Virginia
Petitioner:
Jeffery Allen Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hayes and Candice L. Harts
Defendant:
Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hart v. Komplete Systems Integrators, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hart
Defendant:
Komplete Systems Integrators, Inc. , Kevin Doby and David Dabney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hart v. Newhart
as 1:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
Linwood D. Hart
Defendant:
John Newhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shin et al v. Jang et al
as 1:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
April Shin , Brandon Kim , Danbi So and others
Defendant:
US Speedskating
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Chafin et al
as 7:2010cv00509
Defendant:
Judge Taresa Chafin, T. Shea Cook and Patrick McClintock
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Hanover County School Board et al
as 3:2010cv00794
Plaintiff:
Betty W. Hart
Defendant:
Hanover County School Board and Michael R. Ashby, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hart v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail
as 7:2010cv00483
Petitioner:
Jeffery Allen Hart
Respondent:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
