Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Battle v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv03399
Petitioner:
Larry Battle
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Brashar v. Board of Regents of The University of California et al
as 1:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
Lynda R. Brashar
Defendant:
Board of Regents of The University of California, Los Alamos National Security, LLC, Hugh Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Banks v. Baker et al
as 1:2009cv02912
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks
Respondent:
Thurbert Baker, Brian Owens, Chris Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Lightfoot v. Donald et al
as 6:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Lightfoot
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Shevondah Fields, Tom Sittnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01800
Petitioner:
William Robert Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Esquivel v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01616
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Esquivel
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Smith v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01442
Petitioner:
Eric James Smith
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Samuel Nathaniel Bailey
Respondent:
Hugh Smith and Thurbert E. Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Brown
as 2:2009cv00061
Petitioner:
Shelton Lee
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cowan v. Smith
as 1:2009cv00544
Petitioner:
Stephen Craig Cowan
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
