Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Tafari v. Superintendent
as 9:2012cv00985
Petitioner:
InJah Tafari
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tafari v. Prack et al
as 9:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Albert Prack, Donald Venettozzi, Denise Maas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Selsky et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, Thomas Schoellkopf, G. Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Selsky et al
as 1:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, Albert Prack, Thomas Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Ferrick et al
as 9:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Jason Ferrick, Brian Bush, Matthew Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Weinstock
as 12-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ras-Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Thomas Poole, Jeff Minnerly, John B. Lempke and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Weinstock, Marshall Trabout, Deborah French and others
Tafari v. Brown
as 12-1399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
William D. Brown, Sheryl Butler, John W. Carvill and others
Tafari v. Allen et al
as 9:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
William Allen, Donald Uhler, Steven Racette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Evans et al
as 12-274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrea W. Evans, CEO, Chairwoman, Division of Parole, New York State, sued in her individual and official capacity, Francis Caruso, Assistant to the Director of Operations, Division of Parole, New York State, sued in his/her individual and official capacity, Christina Hernandez, Commissioner, Division of Parole, New York State, sued in her individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Smith et al
as 9:2011cv01476
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Keven Smith, R. Murphy, David Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
