Cases 41 - 50 of 4,202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mecum, Michael v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Mecum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Challoner, Shelley v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Shelley M. Challoner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freund v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Linette Freund
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vongoszknovffczedich-heidler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Nostaligelia Vongoszknovffczedich-heidler
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Novoselsky et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
David Alan Novoselsky and Charmain J Novoselsky
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker, Stephanie v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Stephanie A. Baker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
