Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Warner v. Osborne et al
as 1:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lyle Warner
Defendant:
Richard M Osborne, Thomas J Smith, Wilbur Eugene Argo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferrigno v. Osborne et al
as 1:2013cv02822
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ferrigno
Defendant:
Richard M. Osborne , Gregory J. Osborne , Thomas J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durgerian v. Osborne et al
as 1:2013cv02805
Plaintiff:
John Durgerian
Defendant:
Richard M. Osborne , Gregory J. Osborne , Thomas J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wickham v. Osborne et al
as 1:2013cv02718
Defendant:
Richard M Osborne, Thomas J Smith, Wilbur Eugene Argo and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv02506
Defendant:
Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. and Christopher P. Johansson
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv02357
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Valerie J Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bruce v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Brian Bruce
Defendant:
Andrew J Smith , John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20395
Plaintiff:
John Mark Smith and Phyllis J Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23843
Plaintiff:
Alice J. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
