Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01239
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DAVIS
as 2:2010cv42793
Plaintiff: SAMUEL J. DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DAVIS et al v. ELIKER et al
as 2:2010cv04160
Plaintiff: WALTER C. DAVIS, SR. , GLORIA J. DAVIS , CHARLES C. AMBROSE, JR. and others
Defendant: BLANE ELIKER and LEGACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03702
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAVIS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70177
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN J. DAVIS
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40314
Plaintiff: ROBERT J. DAVIS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DAVIS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31805
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN J. DAVIS
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31817
Plaintiff: SAMUEL J. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv72113
Plaintiff: WILLIAM J. DAVIS and FLORENCE A. DAVIS
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
DAVIS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68537
Plaintiff: BEATRICE J. DAVIS, BEATRICE J. DAVIS, BEATRICE J. DAVIS and others
Defendant: ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?