Cases 41 - 50 of 56
MADABUSHI v. KERRY et al
as 1:2014cv02089
Plaintiff:
PRANAV BHASWANTH MADABUSHI
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, MICHELE THOREN BOND, EDWARD J. RAMATOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DOE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2014cv01889
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CHICHAKLI v. KERRY et al
as 1:2014cv01856
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. CHICHAKLI
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, JACOB J. LEW and ADAM J. SZUBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PICUR v. KERRY
as 1:2014cv01492
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PICUR
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , JOHN DOE, 1 , JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, HAMAS, MALIK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNGER v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
GLENN RICHARD UNGER
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JACOB J. LEW, JOHN F. KERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIDSON v. UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01358
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE U. DAVIDSON, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT, JOHN F. KERRY, WENDY SHERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
DOE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2014cv01231
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RAJKOVIC v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, JOHN F. KERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
