Cases 41 - 50 of 106
TEICHMAN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2017cv01550
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
YEHUDA TEICHMAN
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
TURNER-KAHN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
NANCY TURNER-KAHN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ELLMAN et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv05918
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ELLMAN and KENNETH ELLMAN
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN NEW JERSEY, BRIAN GILFEDDER, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VERIFY SMART CORP. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2016cv04853
Plaintiff:
VERIFY SMART CORP.
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PODOLSKY et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2016cv04072
Plaintiff:
YEHUDIS PODOLSKY and SIMCHA PODOLSKY
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY v. KENNEDY et al
as 2:2016cv02658
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY
Defendant:
MELVENE L. KENNEDY, KENNEDY, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INTERPOOL, INC. v. AYESH et al
as 3:2016cv02490
Plaintiff:
INTERPOOL, INC.
Defendant:
AYEAH A. AYESH, FOUR HORSEMEN INC. and A & A EXP, INC.
Garnishee:
AV LOGISTICS LLC, CHAMPION LOGISTICS, INC. and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHANNA et al
as 3:2016cv02458
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SUNIL KHANNA, POONAM KHANNA, KHANNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
