Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Bentley et al v. Dennison et al
as 2:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Bentley , Felix Tavares , James Johnson and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Dennison , Anthony G. Ellis, II , George B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentley et al v. Dennison et al
as 1:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Bentley , Felix Tavares , James Johnson and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Dennison, Anthony G. Ellis, II, George B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ridley et al
as 2:2010cv05655
Defendant:
P.O. James Johnson, P.O. Leroy Ridley and Town of Hempstead
Plaintiff:
Trent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lee
as 1:2010cv04852
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lee
as 1:2010cv07732
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05614
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
The City of New York , Visar Marku and "John Doe" #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levchenko et al v. MERS et al
as 1:2010cv01804
Defendant:
American Brokers Conduit, American Home Mortgage Corp., American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Levchenko and Viktor Levchenko
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Johnson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv06017
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Johnson v. Teri Woods Publishing et al
as 1:2008cv07123
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Teri Woods Publishing, Teri Ms. Woods and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Smith
as 1:2008cv02979
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
