Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Todd Ashker, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER and DANNY TROXELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, R. Q. HICKMAN, EDWARD J. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Russell Rodriguez v. Jeanne Woodford
as 10-15912
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUSSELL GENE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD
James Alexander v. Weidemeirer, et al
as 10-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEIDEMEIRER, BARRON and JEANNE WOODFORD
Cornejo v. Woodford et al
as 2:2010cv00654
Petitioner:
Efrain Cornejo
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford and M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph Hicks v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-55406
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDOLPH HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and CHARLES HARRISON, Warden
James Sims v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-15389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, K. MENDOZA-POWERS, G. GUNN and others
Concepcion Rios Reyes et al v. Kathleen Dickinson, Warden
as 2:2010cv01226
Respondent:
Katheleen L. Dickinson, J. F. Salazar and Jeanne Woodford
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
People of The State of California
Petitioner:
Concepcion Rios Reyes
Anthony Dawkins v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-55232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, T. OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, C. BUTLER and others
Ervin v. Ayers
as 4:2000cv01228
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Ervin
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford and Robert L. Ayers
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Stacey Langley v. Thomas Carey, et al
as 10-15014
Petitioner - Appellant:
STACEY D. LANGLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS CAREY and JEANNE WOODFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
