Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, C/O Teegan, Dr. Jauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Justin Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Scott McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedt v. Salmonsen
as 23-994
Not Yet Classified:
MT MSP LIBRARIAN
Petitioner:
DENNIS MARTIN FRIEDT
Respondent:
JIM SALMONSEN
Quinlan v. Salmonsen
as 23-981
Not Yet Classified:
MT MSP LIBRARIAN
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ALAN QUINLAN
Respondent:
JIM SALMONSEN
Bloodstone v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Leslee Rosalie Bloodstone
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Jim Salmonsen, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreves v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Crystal Thompson, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bloodstone v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leslee Rosalie Bloodstone
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Sproles v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 23-35338
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINTON SPROLES
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Jones v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Brennan Adrian Jones
Respondent:
Lake County Montana, Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eisch v. Salmonsen
as 6:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Brian L. Eisch
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
