Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Riches v. Badmann et al
as 7:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Natascha Badmann and Timothy DeBoom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Faison et al
as 7:2008cv00150
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Freddie Faison and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Cherry et al
as 7:2008cv00156
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Dammand Cherry, Olivia Giacomazzi and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 7:2008cv00151
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, Pepto-Bismol and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Butts et al
as 7:2008cv00162
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Calvin Butts and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Forbes et al
as 7:2008cv00158
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Malcolm Steve Forbes, Special Housing Unit and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Taylor et al
as 7:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Monique Jenice Taylor and Tnika Monta Washington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Schmidt et al
as 7:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Howard Schmidt and Protect Yourself from Identity Theft
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Acohido et al
as 7:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bryon Acohido and Michael Franzese
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Dawkins et al
as 7:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Richard Dawkins and New Orleans Voodoo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
