Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Levine v. Taylor et al -
as 3:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Sarijini Levine
Defendant:
Dr. J. Taylor, Dr. Ghassan Ghorayeh, P.A. Robert Knott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Strong et al
as 4:2011cv01586
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bryant , Jr.
Defendant:
Kelly Strong, Kirt Stiefer, Amanda L. McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Hoke, et al
as 4:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
Marsa Hall
Defendant:
Frank Hoke, Robert H Quada and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00239
Petitioner:
Misty D. Nunn
Respondent:
Kelly Strong and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinsey v. United States Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2010cv00205
Petitioner:
Elise M. Kinsey
Respondent:
Prison Bureau, Assistant Chairman Kelly Strong, Director Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Merchant et al
as 4:2008cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jack E Thornton
Defendant:
Terrilyn L Merchant, Bruce D Baggett and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Guzman v. Belanger et al
as 4:2007cv04463
Plaintiff:
James Edward Guzman
Defendant:
Jeannith Belanger, Kelly Strong and Kelly King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David, et al v. TDCJ-ID, et al
as 2:2004cv00299
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, Pamela Williams , Bill Cheatham and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Michael David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
