Cases 41 - 50 of 323
Chipsticks LLC v. Fiatte Kang
as 2:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Chipsticks LLC
Defendant:
Fiatte Kang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Katherine Kang v. Marshalls et al
as 8:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Katherine Kang
Defendant:
Marshalls, The TJX Companies, Inc., Cintas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
B. R. L. et al v. Clinica Sierra Vista et al
as 1:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
B. R. L., Franchesca Lara and Miguel Lara
Defendant:
Clinica Sierra Vista, Lynous Willard Hall, Hung Traw Henry Luu Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
B. R. L. et al v. Clinica Sierra Vista et al
as 1:2021at00932
Plaintiff:
B. R. L., Franchesca Lara and Miguel Lara
Defendant:
Clinica Sierra Vista, M.D. Lynous Willard Hall, M.D. Hung Traw Henry Luu Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Amico Management, Inc. v. Tae Ho Kang et al
as 8:2021cv01482
Plaintiff:
AMICO MANAGEMENT, INC., a California corporation and Amico Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Tae Ho Kang, BLUEPRINT USA, LLC, a California limited liability company, Blueprint USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KANG v. PayPal Holdings, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv06468
Plaintiff:
HUEI-TING KANG
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc, Daniel H. Schulman and John D. Rainey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
