Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Goldberg et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv24746
Plaintiff:
Osama Makram Wahny Guirguis, Lorne Morris, Qiang Wu and others
Defendant:
Sarah Kendall, Kenneth T (Ken) Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Goldberg et al v. McAleenann et al
as 1:2019cv24753
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ramon Aragones Pardo, Linh Thi Thuy Pham, Michael I. Goldberg and others
Defendant:
Kevin McAleenann, Kenneth T (Ken) Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Goldberg et al v. McAleenann et al
as 1:2019cv24732
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ramon Aragones Pardo, Linh Thi Thuy Pham, Michael I. Goldberg and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin McAleenann, Chief Sarah Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
