Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02371
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooper v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
Lawson F. Cooper
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson et al v. Watkins and Shepard Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thomas Lawson and Brenda Ann Lawson
Defendant:
Watkins and Shepard Trucking, Inc. and Abdoulaye Kinder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rainey v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission et al
as 8:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Lacey Daniel Rainey
Defendant:
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission , Jerry N. Johnson, Roscoe M. Moore, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv02998
Plaintiff:
Erica Lawson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thompson v. Eagle Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thompson
Defendant:
Eagle Properties, Inc., B.E.D. Realty Limited Partnership, Derek Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01778
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
