Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Edward Throop v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 09-55519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Former Warden, Calipatria State Prison, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BOURLAND, Former Associate Warden, Calipatria State Prison and others
Condalee Morris v. Larry Scribner
as 2:2009cv02183
Petitioner:
Condalee Morris
Respondent:
Larry Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2008cv02318
Plaintiff:
Stanford Paul Bryant
Defendant:
T Armstrong, Tim Ochoa, Gerald J Janda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keith Russell v. Larry Scribner
as 09-55232
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH KEION RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden
Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Throop
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vincent G. Frederick v. Larry Scribner
as 2:2009cv00697
Petitioner:
Vincent G. Frederick
Respondent:
Larry Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Keion Russell v. Larry Scribner
as 2:2008cv07290
Petitioner:
Keith Keion Russell
Respondent:
Larry Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank J. Jones v. Larry Scribner
as 2:2009cv00019
Petitioner:
Frank J. Jones
Respondent:
Larry Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Condalee Morris v. Larry Scribner
as 2:2008cv08538
Petitioner:
Condalee Morris
Respondent:
Larry Scribner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Throop v. Larry Scribner
as 08-57027
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SCRIBNER, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
