Cases 41 - 50 of 80
BERRYHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012mc00533
Plaintiff:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 10th CIRCUIT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Berryhill v. Workman
as 6:2012cv00400
Petitioner:
Lavern Berryhill
Respondent:
Randall Workman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berryhill v. Oklahoma Dept., et al
as 12-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, JUSTIN JONES, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY and others
Berryhill v. Workman, et al
as 12-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, LINDA MORGAN, Deputy Warden, ART LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden and others
Berryhill v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
United States of America and RICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Board Members et al
as 5:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Board Members, Justin Jones, Director of Dentistry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Evan
as 12-6004
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD L. EVANS
Berryhill v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01513
Petitioner:
Lavern Berryhill
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berryhill v. Evan
as 11-6295
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD L. EVANS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
