Cases 41 - 50 of 57
ROCHA v. BROWN & GOULD LLP et al
as 1:2014cv01136
Plaintiff:
NIEVES ROCHA
Defendant:
BROWN & GOULD LLP , DANIEL A. BROWN and LIPMAN LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORIO v. NATIONAL DEBT MANAGEMENT LLC, et al
as 1:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
NEWTON A. GREGORIO
Defendant:
ALAN KEITH LOGUE, NATIONAL DEBT MANAGEMENT LLC, KIMBERLEY L. GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP v. THE LAW FIRM OF JOHN ARTHUR EAVES
as 1:2013cv01940
Plaintiff:
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Defendant:
LAW FIRM OF JOHN ARTHUR EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEY v. RAGGIO et al
as 1:2012cv01545
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SR CREAR BEY
Defendant:
LORRAINE A. RAGGIO , M. KENT SIMS , FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCAIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01214
Plaintiff:
ZACK MCCAIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOCUMB LAW FIRM, LLC et al v. WILSON et al
as 1:2012cv01009
Plaintiff:
SLOCUMB LAW FIRM, LLC and MICHAEL W. SLOCUMB
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILSON and LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL M. WILSON M.D., J.D. AND ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOCUMB LAW FIRM, LLC v. ROESER et al
as 1:2011cv01806
Plaintiff:
SLOCUMB LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant:
ZEKE J. ROESER , MORGAN A. WHITLOCK and ROESER & WHITLOCK, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01452
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MARTINEZ v. ROSALES LAW FIRM, LLP
as 1:2010cv01506
Plaintiff:
MARTA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ROSALES LAW FIRM, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
