Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Shabazz v. Lewis et al
as 1:2011cv08814
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zeref Shabazz
Defendant:
David L. Lewis, James Patterson, John Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv01232
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Albert Brook, Gerald J. Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurley v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hurley
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lucien LeClaire, Jr., David Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Wright et al
as 9:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Lester Wright, Brian Fischer, Lucian J. LeClaire, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rock et al
as 9:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Williams
Defendant:
D. Rock, P. Baker, M. Lira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Williams
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Cheryl V. Morris, Omega B. Albton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Rock et al
as 9:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
Michael Perkins
Defendant:
David A. Rock, Gerald J. Otis, Michael J. Lira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sidney v. Caron et al
as 9:2009cv01326
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sidney
Defendant:
T.L. Caron, D. Tynon and M. Lira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nexbank, SSB v. Landesbank Baden Wurttemberg et al
as 1:2009cv09422
Plaintiff:
Nexbank, SSB, Nexbank, SSB and Nexbank, SSB
Defendant:
Landesbank Baden Wurttemberg, Deutsche Hypothekenbank, Munchener Hypothekenbank eG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4 et al
as 1:2009cv08508
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
