Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01195
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01196
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01105
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
WHENRY et al v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
DOYLE WHENRY , JENIFER ALFREDO , CHARITY ANTUS and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN BEADER, JOHN LECHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
STITT v. ZANDER et al
as 5:2013cv04552
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. STITT
Defendant:
AMY K. ZANDER and MONICA R. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lutz v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv01966
Petitioner:
Lester Nelson Lutz
Respondent:
Superintendent and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUTZ et al v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv04172
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LUTZ and JANET LUTZ
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Mase-Lutz v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv01740
Plaintiff:
Jody L. Mase-Lutz
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lutz v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
June Lutz
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
