Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Blough v. Nazaretian et al
as 8:2016cv02587
Defendant:
Nazaretian, Nick Nazaretian, Tracy Sheehan and others
Plaintiff:
Blough and Melvin E. Blough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01782
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lee v. Pollack and Rosen, P.A. et al
as 0:2017cv60610
Plaintiff:
Tamyka M. Lee
Defendant:
Pollack and Rosen, P.A. and Joseph F. Rosen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 0:2015cv61470
Plaintiff:
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc.
Defendant:
Suzette M Lee, Khandeece S Lee, Sue Lee Beauty Inc. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lee v. Equity Properties Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02239
Plaintiff:
Jack M. Lee
Defendant:
Equity Properties Asset Management, Inc., Equity Properties Asset Management, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Jacqueline S. Chang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wiand v. Lee et al
as 8:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Burton W. Wiand and Burton W. Wiand
Defendant:
Vernon M. Lee and Vernon M. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Cameto Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv23557
Plaintiff:
Luis A Cameto Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America, Rocha, Getchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv00673
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jimenez v. Lee
as 8:2007cv00796
Plaintiff:
Irma Jimenez
Defendant:
Angela M. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
