Cases 41 - 50 of 246
Board of Trustees of The Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. S M S Industrial Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of The Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of The Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Pension Trust Fund , Board of Trustees of the Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Apprentice Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
S M S Industrial Inc. and Suretec Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
M S International Inc v. Verona Quartz, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00087
Defendant:
Does and Verona Quartz, Inc.
Plaintiff:
M S International Inc
Acosta v. C M S H Electrical et al
as 2:2017cv02253
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
C M S H Electrical and CMSH Electrical Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cohea v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv05399
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., C. E. Ducart, Dave Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
M/S R. M. Dhariwal (HUF) 100% EOU v. Zarda King, Ltd.
as 5:2017cv02522
Plaintiff:
M/S R. M. Dhariwal (HUF) 100% EOU
Defendant:
Zarda King, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
M/S R. M. Dhariwal (HUF) 100% EOU
as 5:2017cv02521
Plaintiff:
M/S R. M. Dhariwal (HUF) 100% EOU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
M S International, Inc v. Vaibhav Sanghvi et al
as 8:2017cv00590
Defendant:
Counter Surfaces, Incorporated, Does and Vaibhav Sanghvi
Plaintiff:
M S International, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
