Cases 41 - 50 of 190
Johnson v. Miller-Stout
as 3:2013cv05094
Petitioner:
Wendel Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2013cv00026
Petitioner:
Lanyard Lemont Berry
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foley v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
James W Foley, III
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Airway Heights Corrections Center Mail Room, Dan Pacholke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titian v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Christopher Issac Titian
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Nikki Bauman and Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grenning v. Klemme et al
as 2:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Neil Grenning
Defendant:
Risa Klemme, Craig D Harrington, Jack Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. Richardson et al
as 2:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
Nhan Nguyen
Defendant:
Jack Richardson, G Waldo, L Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bukovsky v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2012cv05875
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Bukovsky
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2012cv00532
Petitioner:
Paul Franklin Garner
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Miller Stout et al
as 2:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
Scott Franklin
Defendant:
Maggie- Miller Stout, Peggy Garcia, Justin Sassone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Richardson et al
as 3:2012cv05729
Plaintiff:
Nhan Nguyen
Defendant:
Jack Richardson, Donna Bynes, James Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
