Cases 41 - 50 of 267
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Skidmore
as 5:2022cv03046
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
(fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ausmus v. Dedeke et al
as 5:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Ausmus
Defendant:
Andrew Dedeke and Eric Thorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Centurion
as 5:2022cv03026
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Centurion and (fnu) Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Meyer
as 5:2022cv03023
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Neosho County District Court and Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Lateniz et al
as 5:2022cv03015
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
(fnu) Lateniz and Lansing Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Failes v. Simecka et al
as 5:2022cv03014
Plaintiff:
William Matthew Failes
Defendant:
Jay Simecka, Jeff Cope, Lue Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Morris
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, J. Roemmich and CoreCivic Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ozment v. Armbrister
as 5:2021cv03209
Petitioner:
Matthew G. Ozment and Matthew Glenn Ozment
Respondent:
Jay Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
