Cases 41 - 49 of 49
McLaughlin v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09791
Plaintiff:
Genevieve McLaughlin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06290
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McLaughlin
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06343
Plaintiff:
Linda McLaughlin
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv03296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McLaughlin and Vincent McLaughlin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08043
Plaintiff:
Susan McLaughlin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05388
Plaintiff:
Sherry McLaughlin and Terry McLaughlin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv05127
Plaintiff:
Lora H. McLaughlin and Stanislaus (Stanley) McLaughlin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03959
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane McLaughlin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00545
Plaintiff:
Timothy McLaughlin
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
