Cases 41 - 50 of 249
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Melody Harrell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv09296
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, AT&T, Inc. Group Insurance Plan and AT and T, Inc. Group Insurance Plan
Plaintiff:
Melody Harrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CNA National Warranty Corporation v. RHN, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv06672
Defendant:
RHN, INC., R & H Automotive Group, Inc., RHC Automotive, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CNA National Warranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adams et al v. Postmates Inc.
as 4:2019cv03042
Petitioner:
Tyrie Abdul-Hameen, Hector Abad, Ralph Abbate and others
Respondent:
Postmates Inc.
Defendant:
Gladys Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Melody Black et al v. Brian Elliott Wanzor et al
as 5:2019cv00885
Petitioner:
City of Clovis
Defendant:
Brian Elliott Wanzor, Clovis Police Department, Curry County and others
Plaintiff:
Melody Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DeMent et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01182
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Scott DeMent and Melody DeMent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarrete v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Navarrete, Chad Wheeler, Diane Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
