Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Herring v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Cedric Oneal Herring
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Detention Officer Sergeant Falade, LT Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmonds v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Norman Simmonds
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Chief Deputy Randy Akies, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young, E. Zejnelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
D'Mante Dontrell Anderson
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Deonta David
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv05055
Petitioner:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
