Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Mosher v. Officer Thake et al
as 1:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Officer Thake, NEOCC, Core Civic/CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Valentine et al
as 1:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Valentine, NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Minehart et al
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Minehart, Warden, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahon v. Xtreme Auto Sales II, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01950
Plaintiff:
Trisha Mahon
Defendant:
Xtreme Auto Sales II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Munna et al v. MMW Cafe LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01668
Plaintiff:
MD Saber Ahmed Munna
Defendant:
MMW Cafe LLC , John Mahon and Eugin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 1:2016cv05924
Plaintiff:
Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant:
Hon. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Roy S. Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 2:2016cv05924
Plaintiff:
Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant:
Hon. R. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Daniel Roy Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Avaras v. Clarkstown Central School District et al
as 1:2015cv09679
Plaintiff:
Connie Avaras
Defendant:
Clarkstown Central School District, Clarkstown Board of Education, New York State Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
