Cases 41 - 50 of 1,320
In Re: Asbestos Products Liab
as 15-1388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH F. BRAUN, ESTATE OF, CREIGHTON E. MILLER, ADMINISTRATOR
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, ACANDS INC, BABCOCK & WILCOX CO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, FIBREBOARD CORP, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP and others
Aids Service Center of Lower Manhattan, Inc. v. Pharmblue L.L.C.
as 1:2014cv02792
Plaintiff:
Aids Service Center of Lower Manhattan, Inc.
Defendant:
Pharmblue L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02315
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Toar v. Sushi Nomado Of Manhattan,Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv01901
Plaintiff:
Junus Toar
Defendant:
Sushi Nomado Of Manhattan,Inc. and Wei Loong Chan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Daniel Neelon v. Stan Bharti, et al
as 12-56958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL P. NEELON
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN BHARTI, BLAIR KRUEGER, FORBES & MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Green v. Nissan of Manhattan, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04389
Plaintiff:
Ferlandia Green
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and Nissan of Manhattan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Daniel P Neelon v. Stan Bharti et al
as 2:2012cv00874
Defendant:
Stan Bharti, Desert Eagle Resources Ltd, Forbes and Manhattan Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Neelon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
