Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. A. Whitacre
as 13-6838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT A. WHITACRE, M. L. STALLINGS, CO II and WARDEN BOBBY P. SHEARIN
Young v Theilen
as 5:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Gerald O. Theilen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Clayton
as 5:2013cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Patricia Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Dority
as 5:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Darryl Maurice Young
Defendant:
Ms. Dority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. Liam Kennedy
as 12-7714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIAM KENNEDY, Librarian (individually & officially) and STATE OF MARYLAND, c/o Douglas F. Gansler, Atty Gen. (individually & officially)
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. A. Whitacre
as 12-7346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. WHITACRE, M. L. STALLINGS, CO II and BOBBY P. SHEARIN
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. Scott Oakley
as 12-7349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT S. OAKLEY, Executive Director, PAULA K. WILLIAMS, Associate Director and LENORA C. ADEGBESON, Administrative Officer
US v. Maurice Young
as 12-7243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE YOUNG, a/k/a Peanut
Young v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00400
Petitioner:
Darryl Maurice Young
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. A. Logston
as 12-7182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. LOGSTON, CO II, J. SMITH, C. M. CAMPBELL, Case Manager and others
Defendant:
FRANK B. BISHOP, Security Chief and JOHN DOES
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
