Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Fitzhugh v. AB McDonough's Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Hillary N. Fitzhugh
Defendant:
AB McDonough's, Inc and William R. Lee, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teagan v. City of McDonough, Municipal Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00607
Defendant:
State of Georgia, McDonough City and William Donald Patten, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Ziahonna C. Teagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Van Laar et al
as 1:2014cv03319
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith , Sr.
Defendant:
William H. Van Laar, DO , William Van Laar CO, LLC , Jodi Pesce and others
Consol_defendant:
Daniel Huff and Nathan Cronic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Estates at McDonough v. Nelson
as 1:2014cv02510
Plaintiff:
The Estates at McDonough
Defendant:
Eric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CALTEX Acquisitions LP v. McDonough et al
as 2:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
CALTEX Acquisitions LP
Defendant:
Joseph N. McDonough, Trout Properties LLC, St. Simons Lodging, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gail Grant, Harrison Grant and Olivia Grant
Defendant:
Eric Holder, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Georgia State Patrol et al
as 2:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Robert Tucker
Defendant:
Georgia State Patrol, Neal Jump , Bill Hitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons v. City of McDonough, Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv00805
Plaintiff:
Gregory M. Lyons
Defendant:
City of McDonough, Georgia and McDonough Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
