Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Maurice Rhodes v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2014cv03614
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Rhodes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oscar Johnson v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
as 2:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
Oscar Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Worth Baker v. Universal Protection Services et al
as 2:2014cv01235
Plaintiff:
Worth Baker
Defendant:
Arthur Booker, Charles Brown, City of Los Angeles and others
Philip Sanchez Osuna Jr. v. City of Monterey Park
as 2:2013cv08138
Defendant:
City of Monterey Park, Doe Tubbs, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Sanchez Osuna , Jr.
Tutor-Saliba-Perini JV et al v. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2013cv06795
Defendant:
Does and The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Plaintiff:
Tutor Perini Corporation, Tutor-Saliba Corporation and Tutor-Saliba-Perini JV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Katzman v. Los Angles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 5:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Katzman
Defendant:
Los Angles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
515 555 Flower Associates LLC v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 2:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
515 555 Flower Associates LLC
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration, Ray LaHood, Arthur T Leahy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
