Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2012cv80480
Petitioner:
Joseph Edwards Monroe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Monroe v. USA
as 1:2012cv00753
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marshall Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Monroe v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09816
Plaintiff:
William H. Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruett v. U.S. Bank, National Association
as 1:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Franklin Monroe Pruett
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Monroe v. Amsted Rail Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09814
Plaintiff:
William H. Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
Amsted Rail Company, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc. and Railroad Friction Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahn v. Barksdale et al
as 7:2011cv00563
Defendant:
Earl Barksdale, Anita Bryant and R. Monroe
Plaintiff:
Keith Alan Rahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe, Jr. v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09799
Plaintiff:
William H. Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe, Jr. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv09796
Plaintiff:
William H. Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09763
Plaintiff:
William H. Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., The Budd Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe v. Marshall et al
as 7:2011cv00122
Defendant:
Stephen U. Baer, Margret McLeod Cain, Hillary Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
