Cases 41 - 50 of 283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cirello v. Riedel et al
as 2:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
Robert Guy Cirello
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Riedel, Jacqueline Gravatt, NLVPO2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Davis v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Davis
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. Moore
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Justin Mullis
Defendant:
Rick Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Moore
as 2:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Angela Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01453
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon et al v. Salkoff et al
as 2:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
S. Seanah Dixon and Toney A. White
Defendant:
S Salkoff, Terrence Jackson, Ernesto Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
