Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Steward v. Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv01652
Defendant:
Metropolitan Police Department and Munoz
Plaintiff:
Quincey Steward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00197
Petitioner:
Peter J. Munoz, Jr.
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Munoz et al
as 2:2010cv01564
Defendant:
Lt. M. Adams, Ms. C. Burson, Mr. L. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz v. Jones et al
as 2:2010cv00919
775) 684-3850 (fax:
Employment Security Division, State of Nevada and Cynthia Jones
Plaintiff:
Carlos Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Munoz v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2009cv00766
Petitioner:
Peter J. Munoz, Jr.
Respondent:
Howard Skolnik and Rex Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munoz et al v. Public Works et al
as 2:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Eddie Munoz and Strip Advertising
Defendant:
Public Works and Clark County, Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Southwest Advertising, Inc., et al v. County of Clark et al
as 2:2007cv01724
Plaintiff:
Southwest Advertising, Inc., Richard Soranno, Wild West Advertising, Inc. and others
Defendant:
County of Clark, Denis Cederburg, Rory Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust
as 2:2007cv00355
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust and Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust
Defendant:
Sherri Gallegos and Ulises Munoz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
