Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Tierney v. Atkins et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Atkins, Neil Abercrombie, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tierney v. Abercrombie, et al
as 1:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Francis X. Sequeira, Rochelle Nieto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Mizukami v. Donna Edwards, et al
as 12-16014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN K. MIZUKAMI
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA C. EDWARDS, THOMAS D. COLLINS, III, THE STATE OF HAWAII and others
Glenn Mizukami v. Donna Edwards, et al
as 12-15984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN K. MIZUKAMI
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA C. EDWARDS, THOMAS D. COLLINS, III, THE STATE OF HAWAII and others
Michael Tierney v. Neil Abercrombie, et al
as 12-15351
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Governor and NOLAN P. ESPINADA, Warden
Mizukami v. Edwards et al
as 1:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Glenn K. Mizukami
Defendant:
Donna C. Edwards, Thomas D. Collins, III, State of Hawaii, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Emmanuel Temple, The House Of Praise et al v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Temple, The House Of Praise , Carl E. Harris , Lighthouse Outreach Center Assembly Of God and others
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie , Loretta J. Fuddy and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Tierney v. Neil Abercrombie, et al
as 11-17475
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Governor and NOLAN P. ESPINADA, Warden
Janis Cowser v. Barack Obama, et al
as 11-17055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANIS COWSER
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN, THOMAS J. VILSACK and others
Baker v. Kealoha et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baker
Defendant:
Louis Kealoha, State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
