Cases 41 - 50 of 640
Nichols v. Travelopod Inc.
as 5:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Travelopod Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Joseph Nichols v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02922
Petitioner:
Joseph Nichols
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Nichols v. Merced County
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Paul Nichols
Defendant:
Merced County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nichols v. Merced County
as 2:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Paul Nichols
Defendant:
Merced County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Nichols v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02054
Petitioner:
Joseph Nichols
Respondent:
Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Jr., Michael Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2022cv09186
Plaintiff:
Marie Encar Arnold
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, George Nichols and Russell Slope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Arnold v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2022cv09188
Plaintiff:
Marie Encar Arnold
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, George Nichols and Russell Slope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nichols v. Credit Associates, LLC
as 5:2022cv08975
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Credit Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
