Cases 41 - 50 of 76
MEYER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PORTER, DIONNE REISERT, SHARON L. REITER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Davis v. Lockett et al
as 5:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Louis Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Gary Venoto, FNU Mezyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCall v. Cuidad De Nuestros Angeles I, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv60735
Plaintiff:
Darren McCall
Defendant:
Cuidad De Nuestros Angeles I, LLC , Luis Navas and Maria Navas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Colon et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon , Norman E. Casiano-Mojica , Franchesska Mercado and others
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. , Google, LLC and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Nava v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
Javier Nava
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Colon et al v. G4S PLC et al
as 2:2017cv14100
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon , Amneris Diaz , Rodney Sumter and others
Defendant:
G4S PLC, G4S Secure Solutions and Noor Salman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barberi v. Nava Motors Corp et al
as 1:2017cv20532
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Nava Motors Corp and El Car Wash #6, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Navas v. Go-Tilt Construction, LLC
as 0:2016cv62334
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Navas
Defendant:
Go-Tilt Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Nava Martinez v. LA HACIENDITA GROCERY, INC. et al
as 9:2016cv80226
Plaintiff:
Edgar Nava Martinez
Defendant:
LA HACIENDITA GROCERY, INC. and CLARIVEL ESQUIVEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
