Cases 41 - 50 of 179
Provident Bank v. Kopanski
as 8:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
Provident Bank
Defendant:
Mark Kopanski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. HYDROTHERAPY VENTURES LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant:
HYDROTHERAPY VENTURES LLC, STEPHEN M GAY and SARAH GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. ANTONUCCI et al
as 2:2015mc00106
Plaintiff:
THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant:
MARC ANTONUCCI and ROBERT TARABOCCHIA
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. M/Y RELAX
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant:
M/Y RELAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
The Provident Bank v. Varnadore
as 4:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
The Provident Bank
Defendant:
Joann K Varnadore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
The Provident Bank v. McCollum
as 1:2015cv20918
Plaintiff:
The Provident Bank
Defendant:
John R. McCollum
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
The Provident Bank v. Borci et al
as 2:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
The Provident Bank
Defendant:
Joseph A. Borci and Rebecca A. Borci
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301
REYES v. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR GINNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2003-085 et al
as 2:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
ELVIS REYES
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR GINNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2003-085, THE PROVIDENT BANK, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Provident Bank v. Encinosa
as 1:2014cv22996
Plaintiff:
The Provident Bank
Defendant:
William Encinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC V. O.432 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY,NEW JERSEY, ET AL.
as 2:2014cv05106
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.432 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, 125 JACKSON AVENUE, LLC and THE PROVIDENT BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.