Cases 41 - 50 of 66
PARIS v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
ASA PARIS
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , BANK OF AMERICA NA and SETERUS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07468
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, JOHNSON, MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ et al v. TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04824
Plaintiff:
LUINY GOMEZ , EDICKSON GARCIA , JULIAN VASQUEZ and others
Defendant:
TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. , FRANK LAZAUSKUS and JOHN DOES # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RENAUD v. PARI et al
as 3:2016cv03581
Plaintiff:
DAVID RENAUD
Defendant:
JOSEPH PARI and LUXURY FINANCIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARIS v. THE ZERROLL CO. et al
as 3:2016cv02669
Plaintiff:
GINA PARIS
Defendant:
THE ZERROLL CO., THE PAMPERED CHEF, LTD, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REAVES v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
JOYCE REAVES
Defendant:
PARIS D. JOHNSON , CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLEMAN v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2015cv06623
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLEMAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER , CHARLES ELLIS , M. KOWNACKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARIS et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv05094
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PARIS and MARTHA PARIS
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
SAINES v. NJ PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2014cv07317
Petitioner:
PARIS SAINES
Respondent:
NJ PAROLE BOARD, WARDEN, CRAF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv07882
Plaintiff:
Mary Mathis , Jose Paris , Russell Alexander and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
