Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Ballew v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01198
Petitioner:
Paris Rayon Ballew
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Mays et al
as 2:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Bernice Bouie Donald, Tony R. Arvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Mays et al
as 2:2012cv03090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Bernice Bouie Donald, Tony R. Arvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serafini v. Page et al
as 1:2011cv01405
Plaintiff:
Travis Michael Serafini
Defendant:
Steve Page, Henry County, B. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benefiel et al v. Page et al
as 1:2011cv01307
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C Benefiel and Travis Michael Serafini
Defendant:
Steve Page, Henry County Jail, B. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00214
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
McGowan v. Anderson et al
as 3:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Johnny L McGowan, Jr
Defendant:
Heather Anderson, Ricky Elmore, Mike Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. NWCX et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
NWCX, Tony Parker, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paris v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv02012
Plaintiff:
Glen Paris
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hale v. Tenn. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01145
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
Tenn. Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
