Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Dusterhoft et al v. Certegy Payment Recovery Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv12372
Defendant:
Certegy Payment Recovery Services, Incorporated, Certegy, Incorporated, Certegy Check Services, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Dusterhoft and Vicky Dusterhoft
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Torts - Injury
Bravo Payments Systems, Incorporated v. Hindes et al
as 2:2009cv11232
Plaintiff:
Bravo Payments Systems, Incorporated
Defendant:
Jill Hindes, Hugh Hindes, Steve Malin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv11845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Klemm v. Global Payments Check Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv11314
Plaintiff:
William J Klemm
Defendant:
Global Payments Check Services, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Global Payments Check Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
William J Klemm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ostergren et al v. Maloney et al
as 1:2007cv15281
Plaintiff:
Karen Ostergren, Eric Ostergren, Easy Payment Solutions, LLC and others
Defendant:
Geoffrey J Maloney, Kathleen M Maloney, David A Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
