Cases 41 - 50 of 86
SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, LLC v. SMITH et al
as 5:2019cv00330
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ERIC SMITH, ALLIANCE CONSULTANT GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CALHOUN v. INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01022
Plaintiff:
ETTA CALHOUN
Defendant:
INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION , TECHNOSYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED CORP. , TECHNOSYSTES SERVICE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0297
CALHOUN v. INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv02307
Plaintiff:
ETTA CALHOUN
Defendant:
INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION, TECHNOSYSTEMS CONSOLIDATED CORP., TECHNOSYSTES SERVICE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0297
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROLLER v. RED PAYMENTS L.L.C. et al
as 2:2018cv01834
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROLLER
Defendant:
RED PAYMENTS L.L.C. and FIRST DATA GLOBAL LEASING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REID v. HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS
as 2:2017cv04399
Plaintiff:
MARK DAVID REID
Defendant:
HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SALA v. CMM ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SALA
Defendant:
CMM ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOHN WU
Counter_claimant:
JOHN WU and CMM ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Counter_defendant:
STEPHEN SALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Treasury Department of the Commonwealth et al v. Gregor et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Treasury Department of the Commonwealth and Timothy A. Reese
Defendant:
David Gregor and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
