Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Dufore v. Wong
as 2:2009cv02427
Petitioner:
Timothy Dufore
Respondent:
R. K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Wong et al
as 2:2009cv02388
Plaintiff:
Dearel Gibson
Defendant:
R. K. Wong, J. W. Haviland, D. K. Sisto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernest Napper, Jr. v. R. Wong, et al
as 09-56245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST NAPPER, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. K. WONG, individual and Associate Warden, official capacity, D. K. DOWNS, individual and official capacity Associate Warden, D. L. QUINN, individual and official capacity Correctional Sergeant and others
Michael Rodney Valdez v. R. K. Wong
as 2:2009cv05833
Petitioner:
Michael Rodney Valdez
Respondent:
R. K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilford v. Wong
as 3:2009cv03311
Petitioner:
David Gilford
Respondent:
R. K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simms v. Wong et al
as 5:2009cv02626
Plaintiff:
Robert Simms
Defendant:
R. K. Wong, N. Grannis, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Grant et al
as 5:2009cv02479
Plaintiff:
Robert Simms
Defendant:
Grant, Maya Paley, T. N. Faloner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marco Perez v. D. L. Runnels, et al
as 09-16124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, M. WRIGHT, R. K. WONG and others
Ernest Napper Jr. v. R. K. Wong
as 2:2009cv03446
Plaintiff:
Ernest Napper, Jr
Defendant:
R. K. Wong, D. K. Downs, D. K. Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Forrest v. Wong
as 5:2009cv01934
Petitioner:
Anthony Forrest
Respondent:
R. K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
