Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Jackson v. Bradford Building Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03977
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Bradford Building Company, Inc. and Granite RE, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Bradford Building Company, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Curtis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Re et al
as 1:2016cv03942
Plaintiff:
David Hill
Defendant:
Christopher (Chris) Re and Apto Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Re Anu El v. Mann
as 1:2016cv03135
Petitioner:
Sekhem Hamud Re Anu El
Respondent:
Jeffrey L. Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neal v. Res-Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02649
Plaintiff:
Claudie Mae Neal
Defendant:
Res-Care, Inc. and Southern Home Care Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
El v. Flake et al
as 1:2016mi00054
Plaintiff:
Sekhem Hamud Re Anu El
Defendant:
Gail C. Flake, Jean Kit Carson and Harris Milton
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00068
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In Re The Application Of Francinie Sandoval Obregton v. Miller
as 4:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
In Re The Application Of Francinie Sandoval Obregton
Defendant:
Joseph Thomas Miller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
RES-GA River Station, LLC et al v. Battle et al
as 1:2015cv04034
Plaintiff:
RES-GA River Station, LLC and RES-GA Enclave
Defendant:
Kim Battle , Valerie Battle and KGB Capital, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RES-GA River Station, LLC v. Battle et al
as 1:2015cv04032
Plaintiff:
RES-GA River Station, LLC
Defendant:
F. Brady Battle, Mary Battle, Monica Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
